Saturday, November 18, 2017

Facebook Launches ‘Trust Indicators’ To Help You Decide What’s Fake News


(Eric LiebermanFacebook is launching a feature that will try to help users decide what news articles on its platforms are legitimate, the company announced Thursday.




Related:  Precedent Set — Germany to Fine Facebook $500K for Every ‘Fake News’ Post they Don’t Delete

Source - The Daily Sheeple

by Eric Lieberman, November 17th, 2017

The tech conglomerate is attaching “Trust Indicators” to certain articles shared on the platform, which will provide information about the publishers. Such details will include the content creators’ polices on ethics, corrections, fact-checking, “ownership structure, and masthead.” Publishers have to upload the extra information through the Brand Asset Library, which is listed under Facebook’s Page Publishing Tools. To achieve its goal, Facebook is working with the Trust Project, “an international consortium of news and digital companies.”


“We believe that helping people access this important contextual information can help them evaluate if articles are from a publisher they trust, and if the story itself is credible,” Andrew Anker, product manager at Facebook, wrote in a blog post. “This step is part of our larger efforts to combat false news and misinformation on Facebook — providing people with more context to help them make more informed decisions, advance news literacy and education, and working to reinforce indicators of publisher integrity on our platform.”

Facebook announced in April that it was improving its “Related Articles” system, in which different content from various outlets on the same story is provided.



Facebook also announced in October that it was starting to experiment with offering “additional context.” That test is part of the more recent one announced Thursday, according to the company.

The social media company has been pressured to help determine which news stories are misleading or fraudulent, and subsequently purge the content from the platform. But even the most outwardly scientific processes are liable to subjectivity, and it’s not quite clear how technical or empirical its fact-checking undertakings will be.

Zuckerberg said last year that the company is going to partner with Snopes as one of its third-party fact checking organizations, even though it almost exclusively employs leftists and has dubious verification skills.


Facebook in general has been trying a lot of unique measures when it comes to combating disinformation on the platform. It recently concluded a test in which it promoted comments mentioning “fake news” on certain posts to the top, making them far more likely to be viewed. Many users complained of the experiment, which either seemed to go awry, or wasn’t fully thought out in the first place.

_________________________
Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com with the error, headline and urlThank you for reading.
________________________________________________________________
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

Support Stillness in the Storm