Sunday, October 15, 2017

Historians Claim to Have Found the Twin of the Great Sphinx

(Paul Seaburn
“Have you ever seen a Sphinx later in Egypt who was alone? The ancient Egyptians mentioned the second Sphinx and it is not only the Greeks, the Romans and the Muslims. It was destroyed between 1,000 and 1,200 AD. “

Related: Rewriting Human History: Geological Evidence Shows the Great Sphinx is 800,000 Years Old

Source - Mysterious Universe

by Paul Seaburn, October 15th, 2017

Come to think of it, no. But I’m not an Egyptologist. However, I agree with many that it seems strange there’s only one Great Sphinx of Giza, especially after finding out that most other depictions of a male sphinx come with an accompanying female twin. For example, Aker, an earth and death deity, is often depicted as two recumbent sphinxes or lions, sometimes facing in opposite directions with their torsos merged. Why wouldn’t the Great Sphinx of Giza also have a partner, possibly facing west and tail-to-tail? Historians also say that ancient Egyptians believed the sun traveled through a tunnel inside the Earth every night and a pair of sphinxes guarded each end. So where is the second Sphinx of Giza?

While it has long been theorized that a second Sphinx once existed, historians and authors Gerry Cannon and Malcolm Hutton are said to be working on a book revealing that it, or at least what’s left of it, is buried in a mound next to the great one. While they have some new ideas on the age of the Great Sphinx, much of their research seems to be based on years of prior work done by Egyptologist Bassam El Shammaa.

El Shammaa noted that the Dream Stela – a vertical stone carved during the reign of Thutmosis IV around 1400 BCE – shows two sphinxes. Another stele clearly depicted two sphinxes. The so-called Inventory Stela – dated to 670 BCE and exhibited at the Egyptian Museum in Cairo – shows evidence that Cheops had to repair the Sphinx’s neck after it was hit by lightning. Moving to present day, El Shammaa points to pictures taken by NASA’s Endeavor Satellite showing an underground anomaly near the Great Sphinx. He thinks those are the remains of the twin and believes it was also hit lightning and destroyed beyond repair due to a metal crown some depictions show it wearing.

Cannon and Hutton agree that this lightning strike would have occurred between 1000 and 1200 CE and the mound probably contains the broken stones. However, they theorize that both the Great Sphinx and its possible twin are much older than currently accepted 4500 years. Cannon says this in an interview with
“The Sphinx had to have been carved when there was no sand there. You can’t carve a rock when it’s under sand. When it was not under sand was about 12,000 years ago and the Egyptians weren’t there.”

Add to this the theory that erosion marks on the Great Sphinx were made when the Giza plateau was under water or under heavy deluges and the new 12000-year-old estimate seems more plausible.

Many of these theories have been proposed before, but the book is expected to bring them all together. While there’s no indication when Cannon and Hutton’s tome will be released, El Shammaa is waiting. He has applied for permits to dig in the anomalous mound next to the Sphinx to look for its long lost twin.

Maybe it doesn’t want to be discovered. Will he find it or die trying?

About the Author

Paul Seaburn Paul Seaburn is one of the most prolific writers at Mysterious Universe. He’s written for TV shows such as "The Tonight Show", "Politically Incorrect" and an award-winning children’s program. He's been published in “The New York Times" and "Huffington Post” and has co-authored numerous collections of trivia, puzzles and humor. Paul likes to add a bit of humor to each MU post he crafts. After all, the mysterious doesn't always have to be serious.

Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at with the error, headline and urlThank you for reading.

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

Support Stillness in the Storm