Thursday, September 14, 2017

A New Website Lets You Automatically Sue Equifax with a Click

(Ethan Wolff-MannThe entrepreneur behind DoNotPay, a free online chatbot that has successfully fought around 375,000 parking tickets in New York, Seattle, and the U.K., is launching a new service on Tuesday that will allow people to sue Equifax for $15,000 in mere minutes.

Related How to Defeat Admiralty Courts And the Law of the (Holy) See - by Judge Dale

Source - Yahoo News

by Ethan Wolff-Mann, September 11th, 2017

On September 7, Equifax revealed a massive cybersecurity breach that potentially exposed the Social Security numbers and other personal information of 143 million people. The breach has spurred two dozen lawsuits in federal court involving lawyers who want to represent many plaintiffs. But it tends to be tough for individuals to sue companies like Equifax on their own.

George Clooney as Miles Massey in “Intolerable Cruelty.”More

“Three days ago I realized I should definitely be doing something for this,” Joshua Browder, DoNotPay’s creator, told Yahoo Finance. “I was doing research and I found no one is going down to small claims court on the state level.”

Despite the pending federal lawsuits, Browder sees small claims court as the ideal way to deal with this, without involving costly lawyers or complex cases that could last years.

“I think people should be empowered to do it themselves,” Browder said. “Instead of taking Equifax to federal court, they could take Equifax to small claims. In a lot of these states you’re not allowed lawyers, there are no legal fees, and state judges are more sympathetic and more fair. They don’t take kindly to big corporations pushing people around.”

Class action cases generally won’t affect a consumer’s right to take a corporation to small claims court, provided the company does business in that state. However, you may have to opt-out of a class action to be eligible, something for which DoNotPay might have to write another bot.

“The consumer can definitely go forward in small claims court, even if a class action is pending,” said F. Paul Bland, an attorney and executive director for Public Justice. “There’s no chance a class action would bar a consumer from bringing such a case.”

How the chatbot works

Earlier this year, Browder had developed a custom software that allows him to quickly create a “chatbot,” a program that asks users questions. Using the answers, the chatbot can create useful forms — in this case, the documents needed to take Equifax to court.

With a team of mostly volunteer lawyers, Browder worked around-the-clock to get this new Equifax-suing robot on his DoNotPay website.

“I thought, what if there were a way to file small claims in all 50 states? So I researched a process and found it’d be easy to do,” Browder said. “The small claims court is rigorous and efficient.”

The hard part, said Browder, was figuring out who to sue and the individual states’ quirks in the small claims suit-filing procedure. California is easy, but states like Texas make it very difficult, requiring a plaintiff to create their own lawsuit and complaint. The other challenge is figuring out where to serve.

In terms of damages, different states cap the amount differently, but somewhere between $10,000 to $15,000 is standard. Justifying these numbers is easy, according to Browder. “Our response is, we seek the maximum because of the permanent damage,” he said. “But in reality I think it varies. I think a lot of people will be hurt by this and will be able to demonstrate if someone has a $15,000 fraud there’s no reason they won’t get $15,000 back.”

DoNotPay does not make money or receive commissions so far, although Browder said perhaps an ad-revenue-based business model may appeal in the future. For Browder, a senior at Stanford, it’s more about the principle than money. In his view, DoNotPay can make a difference by handling the hard parts so a wronged consumer can more easily seek justice.

“It finds all the details of who exactly to sue and who to give the papers to,” Browder said. “All you have to do is provide your name and phone number. Then it spits out 8 pages with instructions and necessary forms. It probably takes about 20 seconds.”

After you have the pages, you take the forms to court and they mail the parties a court date, which may be within in a month or two. The ace-in-the-hole for small claims, Browders said, is that the defendant isn’t allowed to recoup legal costs — making it far less risky if the consumer loses.

A future vehicle for consumers vs. corporations?

Although comparatively user-friendly, the standard amount of effort required to go to small claims court is high enough to make it rare.

“Hardly any consumers go to small claims court, in the scope of things,” Bland said. “But remember, 143 million people were involved in this breach. If a few thousand people filed small claims cases, that would be enormous by historic standards.”

If 5,000 people were to win $10,000 in small claims court, that would be a $50 million. Still, that would be a fraction of those involved and a small financial blow to Equifax.

“It’s almost de minimus compared to the scale of the problem,” Bland said. “A class action could potentially address this for everyone exposed.”

Browder is looking past the specific matter of data security towards the limits of his service. Previously, the app created letters with legalese, citing relevant statues of tenant law and municipal parking rules. Completing 8-page PDF forms to make a ready-made lawsuit is uncharted territory.

“This is a really a test for me,” he said. “Should I open myself up for corporate problems as the next issue to solve?”

The lawsuits are by no means a slam dunk. Besides having to show up at the hearing, the plaintiff will be obligated to justify the restitution.

“The trouble is that it’s hard for the plaintiff to show they’ve been injured,” said Brian Fitzpatrick, a law professor at Vanderbilt Law School specializing in class action litigation. “If you have to change your credit card agencies or contact agencies, that’s something. You can go to court and say, ‘my time is worth X, I want that back.’ But someone’s going to have to articulate those arguments.”

If people can’t do that, or if the judges want detail, then this bot may just be a “paper tiger,” according to Fitzpatrick. “On the other hand, the defendants have to do something to respond, otherwise they’d be in default,” he said.

Individual lawsuits are rare, so corporations strongly prefer them over class actions, which don’t require much consumer initiative. But if somehow individuals started filing lawsuits — perhaps thanks to DoNotPay — the entire landscape could change.

“In a world where a lot of people could sue on their own, I think the defendants are going to like class actions better,” said Fitzpatrick. “They’re not going to want to send a lawyer to every small claims hearings. If someone can figure out a way to make small stakes claims litigable a reality, then I really wonder if it changes the politics of the class action debate.”

Whether it’s a success will depend on how people use it, and whether they win. But at the very least, Browder noted, this specific issue makes an enticing opportunity to try given the visibility, size, and the safety. “There’s no risk in this,” he said. “It’s not like Equifax can say this is unreasonable.”

Link to the Do Not Pay website.

About The Author

Ethan Wolff-Mann is a writer at Yahoo Finance focusing on consumer issues, tech, and personal finance. Follow him on Twitter @ewolffmann. Got a tip? Send to:

Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at with the error, headline and urlThank you for reading.
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

Support Stillness in the Storm