Saturday, August 19, 2017

NASA Images Reveal Geoengineering Agenda -- Climate Engineering Cover-Up: Ship Tracks And Jet Spraying



(Dane WigingtonNASA tells us that the shockingly visible and very extensive "tracks" (or trails) being witnessed on satellite imagery over oceans (like the ones shown below) are ALL the result of pollution being produced by ships, which is in turn creating "clouds".


Related: NASA Satellite Imagery Reveals Shocking Proof Of Climate Engineering -- HAARP Waves

Source - Humans Are Free

by Dane Wigington, August 6th, 2017

Scientists are interested in ship tracks because they want to understand how human emissions influence clouds and, ultimately, Earth’s climate. (NASA)

Ship tracks have shown that clouds that form around man-made aerosols are brighter than other clouds. Man-made aerosols are smaller than natural particles, so the clouds that form around man-made aerosols are made up of smaller cloud droplets.

A cloud made of many smaller droplets reflects more light than a cloud made of few larger droplets, since the surface of each droplet reflects light.

The brighter clouds that result from man-made aerosols reflect more of the Sun’s light back into space, decreasing the amount of light that reaches the Earth’s surface.

This interaction of man-made aerosols with clouds has cooled the Earth, offsetting global warming, though scientists are still not sure by how much.

More accurate predictions of future warming depend on understanding how much cooling the brighter clouds provide… (NASA)

Is it rational to fully accept the "ship tracks" explanation from NASA as the ONLY source of the trails we so clearly see in the following images?

NASA, of course, does not in any way acknowledge the ongoing geoengineering / solar radiation management jet aircraft dispersions.

We must consider and remember that any method of delivering toxic particles into the atmosphere (ship despersions or jet aircraft despersions) are forms of climate engineering / intervention which are inflicting immense damage to the overall life support systems of the planet.

In reality, NASA is nothing more than a military industrial complex contractor for the power structure, deceiving the public has always been a major part of this agency's mission.

Let's consider NASA's official position on geoengineering (or "chemtrails"), NASA, NOAA, NWS, and the USAF tell us the relentless bombardment of atmospheric particulate spraying in our skies is all just "contrails".

Is this explanation in any way credible? If the design characteristics of the modern high bypass turbofan jet engine are taken into account, NASA's official "just contrails" narrative can be seen for what it is, total deception.

Below is a satellite animation loop that clearly reveals numerous extremely long trails (some well over 500 miles in length) covering much of the Eastern Pacific off of the west coast of North America.


NASA tells us these are ALL just "ship tracks" from ship engine combustion exhaust created by standard commercial shipping vessels, but is this official explanation reasonable in all cases?

First, with the extreme volume of shipping traffic operating in the Eastern Pacific, why would only a select percentage of ships leave such long and blatantly visible "tracks"?

"Ship tracks" off of the North American west coast. (NASA)
Next, why would shipping companies (that are extremely cost conscious of the staggering amount of fuel their ships consume) allow their vessels to meander over the oceans in sometimes haphazard patterns and directions?

Some of the largest ships can burn nearly 400 tons of fuel per day, their primary objective is to take the shortest possible routes for obvious economic reasons.

Why would a commercial ship plot a course along some of the "ship track" trajectories we see on satellite images?

(Wind movement / drift of "tracks" cannot account for many of the observed trail directional anomalies).

"Ship Tracks" over the Northern Pacific Ocean. (NASA)

The image below reflects marine shipping lane traffic:

The objective of shipping vessel traffic is to get from port to port by the
shortest most direct route possible as the graphic above clearly reflects.


The clustering and grid pattern like formations (of what we are officially told is just naturally occurring "ship tracks" due to combustion engine exhaust) should cause any objective and analytical individual to take pause regarding the official narrative on this phenomenon.

When we can say with certainty that top military commanders have long since considered the disintegrating climate system to be the top national security threat, and when we know that "marine cloud brightening" is a primary form of "proposed" climate engineering, it is reasonable to conclude this form of planetary geoengineering is exactly what we are witnessing.



But, the remaining question is still this, are all the "trails / tracks" we are seeing over the oceans exclusively from ships as NASA would have us believe?

Or are many of the long uniform "trails / tracks actually aircraft dispersions just as we see over land?

"Ship Tracks" off of Europe's Atlantic coast. (NASA)
"Ship Tracks" over the Northern Pacific Ocean. (NASA)
"Ship Tracks" over the Northern Pacific Ocean. (NASA)
Ship Tracks off the Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia (NASA)

Let's again consider that many of the "ship tracks" we see on radar remain fairly uniform in width for distances of 500 to 600 miles and even more.

When we take into account the mathematics of this equation, the "ship tracks" narrative becomes questionable at best in numerous cases.

Many of the largest container ships are now traveling at speeds as low as 12 knots in order to reduce fuel consumption.

At this speed, some of the longest "tracks" we see in satellite images could take 2 to 3 days to lay out. Are we to believe that such long and uniform "tracks" would remain in tact for up to several days?

Especially if the source of the atmospheric particle dispersion occurred at sea level from the smoke stack of a slow moving ship?

Geoengineering particulate dispersions from jet aircraft can spread out and cover the skyline in time frames of an hour or less.

Why would we believe the "ship tracks" hold a uniform shape for so long over distances of up to 500 or 600 miles or more?

Below is a shocking photo of what NASA would have us believe is just "condensation trails" from normal air traffic. Would any rational person accept such a blatant and glaring official lie?

Populations around the globe have so far, unfortunately, accepted the
"commercial air traffic condensation trail" official lie that is fed to them by
agencies and the vast majority of government sponsored academia.


The jet aircraft particulate dispersion trails in the photo above are similar in size and length to what NASA says are just "ship tracks" over the oceans.


Global dimming is an undisputed ongoing scenario on our planet and is a direct result of atmospheric particulate loading (the exact goal of climate engineering / solar radiation management).

Low altitude jet aircraft particulate dispersions / spraying can be clearly seen over the oceans from shoreline locations on days with the conducive conditions for such observations.

Marine cloud brightening is one of many known objectives of the climate engineering criminal cabal (as is ocean fertilization).

The over the ocean operations are likely being carried out with both jet aircraft and sea surface vessels (all such operations are, of course, highly toxic and of grave concern).

There is a mountain of data to confirm that global climate engineering has long since been a lethal reality.

This data includes patents, government documents, inarguable film footage of jet aircraft spraying, and countless photographs of ongoing atmospheric aerosol spraying operations.

There is also the on the record dire climate disintegration concerns of military leaders which are well known (and have long since been publicized).

Why wouldn't any rational person conclude the obvious? Climate engineering has long since been fully deployed all over the world.

The climate scientist community (and corporate media) betrayal of the truth (for a paycheck and a pension) is a primary reason that the "condensation trail" lie persists and thus the public largely remains oblivious to the ongoing climate engineering operations.



Illegal federal gag orders on all NWS and NOAA employees is another major factor in the ongoing climate engineering cover-up.

The ardent denial of geoengineering by some climate scientists can only be considered extremely fanatical and alarming. What are they being threatened with?

What is the bottom line with the climate science communities conclusions about climate engineering (when asked to state their opinion ON THE RECORD)? A recent survey of nearly 1500 scientists by the "Legal Alliance to Stop Geoengineering" (LASG) was very revealing.

Not one of this massive number of academicians was willing to deny climate engineering on the record, not one.

The ongoing climate engineering insanity is mathematically the most destructive form of anthropogenic activity yet inflicted on our once thriving planet.

Every single awake and aware individual is desperately needed in the critical battle to expose and halt climate engineering, reaching a critical mass of awareness is the only way forward.


_________________________
Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com with the error, headline and urlThank you for reading.
_______

________________________________________________________________
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

Support Stillness in the Storm