Monday, June 5, 2017

UFO Hoaxes: When Things Get Complicated -- Official Secrecy, Bad Evidence Analysis, and Hoaxers Make Personal Discernment Very Important


(Stillness in the Storm Editor) The following is an article discussing the debate between genuine and authentic UFO sightings. Ufology does a commendable job at recording UFOs, gathering documents, and compiling insider/whistleblower testimony, but it seems to be lacking insofar as how this information is analyzed and interpreted. Anyone who has studied ufology in detail quickly realizes there is great disagreement in the field—some researchers contend all UFO sightings are extraterrestrial in origin, others say that the bulk of sightings are secret government projects, and still others suggest they are outright hoaxes by people who want to discredit believers. In my estimation, there seems to be a healthy mix of all three. But moreover, the notion of a secret space program and the government-sponsored coverup of UFOs and related phenomena makes this issue of discerning the information presented by ufology even more critical.

Despite disagreements of experts in ufology, a clear case for the existence of secret space programs can be made. 

Related Boeing's "You Just Wait" Ad Reveals 100 Year Partial Disclosure Timeline -- Analysis | Disproving Partial Disclosure, Insider Testimony, and Steering Collective Consciousness Toward the Full Disclosure Timeline

As a part of those programs, the use of official secrecy is also apparent.

Consider the following:
In Dr. Michael Salla’s book, Insiders Reveal Secret Space Programs & Extraterrestrial Alliances, Unacknowledged Special Access Programs (USAPs) are discussed in which participants are given authority to hide their activities from the public. Waived USAPs are a more secretive set of programs not required to report any of their activities or existence for congressional oversight. In these deep-black projects, oral briefs are provided to read-in persons only—those individuals who have a valid need to know. Participants are authorized to deny the existence of these programs under any circumstances, including congressional subpoena, and are provided a cover story to hide the project's existence. 
A supplement to the DoD manual related to special access programs states that cover stories can be generated with the goal of hiding a program's true purpose.
Program Cover stories. (UNACKNOWLEDGED Program). Cover stories may be established for unacknowledged programs in order to protect the integrity of the program from individuals who do not have a need to know. Cover stories must be believable and cannot reveal any information regarding the true nature of the contract. (source)
This suggests that there were most likely two sets of secret programs, one that was designated deep-black or USAP, and an acknowledged project that would draw public attention. (source)
In effect, unacknowledged programs not only outright lie to the public but they also develop elaborate cover stories to deceive researchers. 

For Example, in the film Mirage Men, Richard Doty is exposed as a disinformation agent, who worked for the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) stationed at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico. During his time there in the 1980s, he was apparently supplying hoaxed documentation to various ufologists in an effort to discredit certain figures in the field. And Doty was largely successful. 

Likely, this is not the only example of disinformation. 

What's worse is that established ufologists can sometimes reject new information that goes against their entrenched theories, muddying the waters even further with ad hominem attacks and dubious arguments. 

Presently, there is a heated debate focused around an alleged secret space program insider, Corey Goode. While Goode offers no evidence to support his claims, his dissenters and those trying to debunk his story fail to prove it a hoax, often resorting to character assassination attempts instead of focusing on Goode's claims. The debate highlights the deficit in proper analysis and objective assessment within the field, as some presenters are clearly trying to maintain their narratives amid the emergence of new information. 

Related Corey Goode Responds to Claims Made by Bill Ryan


Moreover, there are some researchers who do not seem to understand how to confirm a claim with evidence, and as a result, tend to overemphasize one data point or another, sometimes relying on corroboration with other unproven data points as proof their claims are valid. The overall effect is incredibly befuddling for the growing throngs interested in answering the question: Are we alone in the universe?

In general, there appears to be a well-coordinated effort to marginalize UFO and extraterrestrial researchers, including one effort focused around dividing the community against itself. As a result, it is of paramount importance for those who research these topics to develop proper discernment. 

The writer below asserts that some of the more well-known topics in ufology are hoaxes, which has the tendency to trigger some in the field such that they become irrational. As someone who studies psychology, philosophy, and the science of how we come to know the truth, it is important for us to learn how to objectively analyze claims of all types, be they claims of a hoax or authentic sightings. 

Briefly, a claim is a statement or question that describes reality. In order to determine if the claim is true, one needs to analyze what it says and gather evidence within the scope or context of what is described. Lack of evidence doesn't mean the claim is true—it just means it can't be confirmed. And most importantly, just because a claim sounds unbelievable—to us—doesn't mean it is untrue either. Conversely, just because a claim "resonates" or feels right doesn't mean it is true. The bottom line is that in order to know whether a claim is accurate, one needs to measure what it really is, which quickly highlights falseness and deception. 

For example, you can tell if the weather prediction was right by going outside to observe the climate yourself. But until you do, you can't know, with precision and objective certainty, that a claim is true or not. 

For those seeking confirmation of claims in ufology, direct substantiation via evidence is often not possible. In most cases, researchers have unverifiable claims, speculation and uncertainty to work with. Thus, our ability to properly assess a claim, and not blindly believe or blindly reject it out of hand, is of great value. 

In conclusion, while many would like quick easy answers when it comes to the UFO question, there just isn't enough hard evidence to work with in almost all cases. Moreover, with hoaxers, disinformation agents, and less than objective experts out there, the need to develop our own personal discernment skills is overwhelming.

The good news is that while this places a large burden of responsibility on our shoulders, when we do develop personal discernment skills, we become more immune to deception. I'd say that's one benefit well worth the effort. 

- Justin

Source - Mysterious Universe

by , June 4th, 2017

Well, my three recent articles on questionable documents (one on Marilyn Monroe, the second on the Rendlesham Forest affair, and the third on weird goings-on in 1940s-1950s Chicago) provoked a handful of emails in response. But, they weren’t quite the responses I was anticipating. With hindsight, though, maybe I should have expected them. Of the eleven people who contacted me, not a single one took the view that the documents were nothing but hoaxes perpetrated by people within the field of Ufology (which, in my view, is the most likely of all the explanations, even though I’m slightly open-minded on the Marilyn document, but as for the other two: pure garbage). Rather, all eleven only served to complicate things even further by suggesting that the hoaxes just had to be the work of – as one person worded it – “government agents.” Not sad figures with too much time on their hands and a lack of what is known as a social-life, after all?

Terms like “disinformation,” “counterintelligence” and “psychological warfare” were tossed around, as a means to explain to me and justify why these were not just time-wasting hoaxes. So, in a roundabout way, by highlighting the three questionable documents referred to above, I inadvertently added to – or, at the very lest, encouraged – the conspiracy theories, rather than laying them to rest.

The U.S. Government describes psychological warfare as, “The planned use of propaganda and other psychological actions having the primary purpose of influencing the opinions, emotions, attitudes, and behavior of hostile foreign groups in such a way as to support the achievement of national objectives.” Then, there is the matter of disinformation – a word which pops up regularly in the UFO field. English Oxford Living Dictionaries says of disinformation that it is, “False information which is intended to mislead, especially propaganda issued by a government organization to a rival power or the media.”

And there is this from Wikipedia: “Historically the word ‘disinformation’ has been reserved for a body of false information propagated at the state and state secret services level but in recent times it has a looser meaning in English relating to propaganda, fake news or a body of lies by any organization and possibly any individual.” As for counterintelligence, Merriam-Webster states that it amounts to the “…organized activity of an intelligence service designed to block an enemy’s sources of information, to deceive the enemy, to prevent sabotage, and to gather political and military information.”

Now, it’s important to note that counterintelligence, disinformation, and psychological warfare certainly have played significant roles in the domain of Ufology. Take, for example, the saga of Paul Bennewitz, whose life was ruined when he got too close to something that certain figures in the world of government were determined to keep him away from. The same might be said when it comes to the multiple explanations put forward to explain the Roswell affair of July 1947.

So, in light of all this, yes, the three documents referred to above could have been the work of people in government; people who were skilled in the arts of disinformation and counterintelligence. But, what intrigued me most, from reading the emails, was the clear yearning for the documents to be more than merely someone’s obscure prank. The wording of several of the people who emailed me made it abundantly obvious that they wanted the documents to be more than just the results of a bit of cut-and-pasting and photocopying in mommy’s basement. Why? The excitement factor, I suppose. If that’s the kind of thing that excites you, of course.

Ufologists have achieved great things over the years and decades. But, sometimes – in fact, I would say, more than often – Ufologists have been guilty of over-thinking a situation when, in reality, the most likely and down-to-earth explanation is the correct one.
Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at with the error, headline and urlThank you for reading.
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

Support Stillness in the Storm