Friday, May 12, 2017

Conspiracy Fact: Geoengineering, Long Denounced As a Conspiracy Theory, Now Openly Advocated by Harvard Scientists to Alter the Climate


(Vicki Batts) It seems that proponents of geoengineering are realizing that they can’t hide their sinister plans behind the mask of “conspiracy theories” forever, and are now opting to try to persuade the masses that chemtrails are all part of their plan to protect the earth. As we all know, those of us who have been aware of chemtrails and geoengineering efforts for quite some time have consistently been disparaged and silenced. Now, instead of continuing to deny the existence of these actions, scientists have taken to the media to declare that they are just beginning to experiment with spraying aerosols into the atmosphere, supposedly to combat “climate change.”


Related Restoring Toxic Environments and the Earth Mother | Microbes: The Environmental Solution To Chemtrails

Source - The Event Chronicle

by Vicki Batts, May 5th 2017

Funnily enough, the same news site which shared this breaking story in mid-April 2017, the Daily Mail, also published an article declaring that chemtrails were fake not too long ago. Apparently, they’ve had a change of heart. Chemtrails are now suddenly a “tool” to save the planet, we’re told!

As the Daily Mail now admits, Harvard scientists have announced that they will be using aerosol sprays in the sky, purportedly in an effort to gain control over Earth’s climate. Some scientists, however, believe that the effects of this could be catastrophic. Surprise, surprise.




The Harvard researchers say that the so-called “first-of-its-kind” experiment will likely begin sometime next year. Of course, this is not really the first time scientists will be spraying aerosols into the atmosphere; it’s just the first time they’re actually admitting it. EPA whistleblower Michael Davis, who served with the agency for 16 years and worked for the National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) Programs Branch of the Water Division in Region 5, located in Chicago, Illinois, came forward earlier this year to expose the federal agency’s geoengineering efforts. Davis was reportedly fired for daring to speak up about his concerns. “I was terminated as a public servant performing a public service for raising the issues of anthropogenic deposition of aluminum due to atmospheric geoengineering,” he stated.

Davis is not the only scientist who has concerns about the consequences of attempted climate control. The controversial technique of using aerosol sprays to block the sun’s rays could yield catastrophic consequences. Not only would carbon dioxide continue to build up, but some researchers say that should we ever need to stop spraying the aerosols — perhaps because of damage done to the environment as the compounds fall to the ground — it could inevitably lead to an expedited global shift in temperature.

As Daily Mail explains, in the past, researchers were at least focused on using non-reactive compounds. Funnily enough, referencing past research clearly shows that geoengineering is not new. The use of non-reactive compounds was first investigated as a way to minimize damage to the ozone layer, but researchers are now throwing caution to the wind.

“Instead of trying to minimise the reactivity of the aerosol, we wanted a material that is highly reactive but in a way that would avoid ozone destruction,” said co-author Frank Keutsch. The researchers are reportedly now focusing on calcite, which is a fairly reactive compound found in limestone. This an odd choice because when calcite breaks down, it produces carbon dioxide — which is what climate change enthusiasts generally blame for climate change to begin with.




Calcite is known for doing this in the presence of an acid, specifically diluted hydrochloric acid (HCl). And as research has documented, this acid is present in Earth’s atmosphere — and in 2014, it was documented that the amount of HCl in the Earth’s stratosphere had increased. You can see where this is going: If these two compounds were to meet, it could potentially lead to the production of more CO2, especially given that nano-sized or smaller particles of calcite would be needed to create an aerosol.

As the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration explains, “Carbon dioxide belongs to a category of gases known as ‘greenhouse gases.’” Greenhouse gases are considered to be one of the factors that contribute to the “global warming” that these geoengineering efforts are purportedly being designed to fight.

Perhaps this is why the researchers say that if the sun’s rays were no longer blocked, their efforts would actually cause Earth’s temperature to shift even faster. 

Sources:

DailyMail.co.uk

GeoengineeringWatch.org

ESci.UMN.edu

Climate.gov
_________________________
Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com with the error, headline and urlThank you for reading.
________________________________________________________________
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

Support Stillness in the Storm

Sign up for Gaia TV

Sign up for Gaia TV
By signing up through this link you also support SITS