Tuesday, March 7, 2017

Facebook Ministry Of Truth Begins Plot To Label Alternative Media Fake News

(Aaron KeselFacebook is releasing a new feature to combat fake news that will allow users to report content as fake – but it’s the people behind the ministry of truth that’s worrying.

Related Google And Facebook Will Be Arbiters Of Truth In The War On "Fake News" or the Alternative Media

Source - We Are Change

by Aaron Kesel, March 6th, 2017

Facebook began testing these “features” in December according to Mashable. Facebook users can now mark a story in their newsfeed as fake.

This will result in a story having a disputed by “Fact-checkers” popup under its title along with a link to a corresponding article explaining why it might be false, as seen by a Gizmodo reporter on Twitter.

These posts will then appear lower in the news feed, throttled by Facebook’s algorithm, and users will receive a warning before sharing the story on their Facebook feeds, RT reported.

Although, the Seattle Tribune isn’t an alternative media source and is indeed a satire site as noted by their own disclaimer policy this could have dangerous repercussions for alternative media.
Stories marked as disputed may be subject to “fact-checking” by organizations such as Politifact or Snopes two notoriously biased “fact-checking” sites that have glaring credibility issues. Both organizations are slanted to the left and have dismissed credible government documents on various topics. Other “fact-checkers” include the very fake mainstream media itself – ABC News, FactCheck.org, and the Associated Press.

[RELATED: Shady “Fact Checking” Sources Snopes and Politifact DEBUNKED!]

Snopes even decided to bash We Are Change in December when we wrote about Senator Rand Paul and U.S. Rep Justin Amash’s concerns about provisions within the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act – which essentially had a section that codified the criminalization of so-called “fake news.”

[RELATED: EXPOSED: Snopes’s Lack of Journalist Integrity and Its Assault on WeAreChange]

According to Facebook, third-party fact checkers must agree to a fact-checking code of ethics by the Poynter Institute.

A code of ethics might be hard for Snopes to follow, considering their history of hatchet jobs, including failing to address a link we included in our article.
We fact-check claims using the same standard for every fact check. We do not concentrate our fact-checking on any one side. We follow the same process for every fact check and let the evidence dictate our conclusions. We do not advocate or take policy positions on the issues we fact-check.
We want our readers to be able to verify our findings themselves. We provide all sources in enough detail that readers can replicate our work, except in cases where a source’s personal security could be compromised. In such cases, we provide as much detail as possible.
We are transparent about our funding sources. If we accept funding from other organizations, we ensure that funders have no influence over the conclusions we reach in our reports. We detail the professional background of all key figures in our organization and explain our organizational structure and legal status. We clearly indicate a way for readers to communicate with us.
We explain the methodology we use to select, research, write, edit, publish and correct our fact checks. We encourage readers to send us claims to fact-check and are transparent on why and how we fact-check.
We publish our corrections policy and follow it scrupulously. We correct clearly and transparently in line with our corrections policy
Facebook has added a question to its help center page entitled “How is news marked as disputed on Facebook?” The section notes, however, that this feature is not yet available to everyone.

Facebook introduced this solution to “fake news” last December amid claims that false news influenced the outcome of the U.S. presidential election.

This resulted in an anonymous list by “propornot” calling several alternative media outlets including We Are Change “Russian propaganda” being published in the Washington Post.

[RELATED: We Are Change Named On Egregious List Of Media Promoting ‘Russia Propaganda’]

The unproven claims that fake news influenced the election have been disputed by a Stanford University/NYU study authored by NYU economics professor Hunt Allcott and Stanford economics professor Matthew Gentzkow, who found that fake coverage did not change the outcome of the election.

“Fake news” was a propaganda term designed to destroy alternative media – but we are sticking it right to the real propagandists – the very fake mainstream media.

Fight back against this censorship, by marking the mainstream media article on Facebook for what they are – fake news.
Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com with the error, headline and urlThank you for reading.

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

Support Stillness in the Storm