Wednesday, December 21, 2016

Discernment Exercise: Kent Dunn: Chem Trails Being Sprayed Today out of Lincoln, Ne. They cannot Hide: 402-309-1110 & PUBLIC LAW 105-855 Says US Gov can Spray Chemical Weapons on USA Citizens !!!


(Stillness in the Storm Editor) I cannot confirm if the reports offered below are accurate. Discernment is advisable. And if anyone does have any data to confirm or deny this information, please send it to me.

REGARDING KENT DUNN -- BE ADVISED: I have received a swath of feedback about Kent Dunn's claims and information. Some people say he is a total fraud or shill but offer no evidence to support their claim. Others believe what he says without question, citing how well it resonates with their own beliefs. 

In my personal view, in some cases, Dunn speaks about real issues that can be verified with some research. In other cases—especially regarding certain events—Dunn's claims cannot be verified. For example, he recently alleged that mass arrests were taking place in various locations around the globe, which cannot be verified using normal means—as the mainstream media will not report on these things even if they were happening. Some seem to think that because an assertion is either unbelievable or unverifiable it is untrue, but this is not a valid basis to refute a claim's validity. 

As a result of the difficulty in validating Dunn's information, it provides an excellent venue to test and improve our holistic discernment skills. This is one of the reasons why I am sharing his information—not because I believe it blindly. 

As a result of the sensational aspect of some of Dunn's claims, some people dismissed them entirely. I suspect that such dismissal is based on, what I call, incredulity bias—the idea that something can't be true because it is too unbelievable. But incredulity is not a valid reason to dispute a claim. 

As an example, for centuries, in Europe, it was believed unquestionably that the Earth was flat. Anyone claiming otherwise was regarded as insane. In other words, it was incredulous to most people that the Earth was anything else but flat. Of course, the shape of the planet did not change to match people's beliefs. More to the point, incredulity alone is not enough to refute a claim's validity. Whether you are capable of acknowledging reality or not, reality itself remains unchanged—the Truth is not democratic. An incredulity fallacy is an incorrect belief that something is not true (or is true) based on how well it resonates with our belief system. 

Why am I sharing this information?

I am sharing this material for several reasons. One, because Dunn's data is offered without supportive evidence, but is often reflective of accurate information points—but not always. Therefore, the information can be used as a way to exercise holistic discernment skills, by: 
1. listening to the claims thoroughly,  
2. fact-checking each point against as many data sets as possible,  
3. objectively assessing each resulting comparison to determine if it is true or not. In this way, one can move beyond the intuitive, gut, or credibility level of discernment and gain skill in assessing a claims plausibility based on what is said instead of who is saying it—facts and evidence available.  
While intuition and emotion are often the first steps in discernment, in order to gain laser-like precision and empowerment, one must assess a claim with evidence and logic. Thus, holistic discernment is a blend of intuition and reason, resulting in the acquisition of intrinsically derived knowledge that empowers the individual to know first hand if something is true or not—and most importantly—why. Intrinsic knowledge sourced from holistic discernment empowers us with greater powers of perception and manifestation—we can literally see more and understand more clearly what we are seeing.

All too often, people reject information because "it doesn't resonate" or they blindly accept it because it does. But in order to know precisely whether or not a claim is true, we must look past the messenger and focus on the message. Thus, whether you think Dunn is credible or not, what he says can be analyzed and discerned. Dismissing his claims without investigation is not discernment, it is prejudice and close-mindedness. 


Dunn's claims are sometimes unverifiable. In other cases, they can be vetted. These posts service as a gateway to expose others to the information being discussed. In the future, if Dunn is revealed to be a fraud or the quality of his material proves inaccurate, I will issue an update. 


For now, some of the data remains unverified and unproven, and the catalyzing effects of awakening consciousness via holistic discernment is still possible. The opportunity to polish up your discernment skills is there. 

In the following videos, Dunn discusses increased chemical spraying in some areas of the U.S., and a "chemtrail law" that allows this spraying on the public. 

As an example of holistic discernment regarding the claim of a "chemtrail law," I offered the following commentary on the second video. I used my pre-existing research and knowledge to verify that there is indeed a "chemtrail law" and expounded on the legal basis of it. I also offered, using the same understanding of law and contracts, how we can stop these things and regain control. 
Yes, there is a legal framework in place to legally do all sorts of horrific things to people. In order to understand this, one needs to research legal policy, language, and law—especially contracts or Equity law.

In summary, the people of the world, including citizens of the USA, inc. are considered enemies of the State. This was legally defined through a tapestry of policies, such as the Act of 1871, the War Powers Act of 1913, and the amendments made in 1933, the Trading with the Enemy act, and—as Kent stated, PUBLIC LAW 105—85. I have provided a link to that document and another post that I strongly encourage everyone to become familiar with. Ignorance or dismissal of these policies WILL NOT protect us. We need to gain key knowledge and understanding and then act as a group of free thinking individuals to rebut each of the fallacious legal presumptions defined in the tapestry of statutory codes within the USA and any other incorporated body on the planet.

These "laws" are effective because we, the people, do not exercise our sovereign powers to rebut them. IN law, the most coherent and organized organization, acting with honor and precision, rules the day—which we can become if we do our homework and face reality.

PUBLIC LAW 105—85
https://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2015/01/us-law-allowing-chemtrailing-passed-in.html

WE are the “Enemies of the State” -- Documented Evidence -- And How to Change The Status Quo
http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2016/09/WE-are-the-Enemies-of-the-State-Documented-Evidence-And-How-to-Change-The-Status-Quo.html
- Justin






_________________________
Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.comThank you for reading.
_________


________________________________________________________________
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]
SaveSave

Support Stillness in the Storm