Saturday, October 1, 2016

Teaching the Controversy | Clinton Caught Cheating at the Debates, Weird Eyes Again, Side by Side Ear Pics, and Initial Survey Data from YouTube Audience

(Stillness in the Storm Editor) I almost didn't post this article because it's so wildly sensational. But on Thursday night I saw Fox News do a segment about almost all the items listed below in an effort to debunk them. 

Usually, when the mainstream media gets involved in the conspiracy theory debunking business it means that (a) the story is gaining popularity and some kind of media spin is needed, and (b) there might be something to the theories. 

One thing I noticed while watching the debates was the way color was used. Blue was the most prevalent color, which has the effect of lulling one into a state of acceptance and passivity—something that is a well known psychologically. Red has the polar opposite effect, acting as a stimulator. Clinton was wearing very bright red clothing, which seemed to be part of a subtle conditioning tactic to get people to think she is strong, safe, and secure, oppose to Donald who was wearing a blue tie. The powers that be know about these effects and this event seemed to be layered with subtle conditioning devices to get people to switch from Trump to Clinton. 

For my part, I don't think voting for either of them will do much but shuffle some chairs on a sinking ship. Regardless of who we vote for, the shadow government always wins. And the argument that we need to vote for one person so another person doesn't get into power hasn't been too effective. 

Related The Government Doesn't Represent You, so Why Vote for it? -- Vote Nobody for President: Lead Yourself in 2016
Of course, as with all things, discernment is advisable. Leave a comment and let us know what you think.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. " – Aristotle

- Justin

Source - Steemit: Aggroed

by Dr. Reich, September 29th 2016

Many weird happenings follow the Clintons around everywhere they go.  in this particular one she's blatantly caught signaling debate moderator Lester Holt.  She's clearly got a wire on her back, and as far as I can tell she's not supposed to have it.  Her eyes go very wonky and there appears to be a sloppy edit done afterwards.  Respect to my Removing the Shackles friends who found me an ear picture to compare against a younger Hillary.  We'll see if it matches.
I would appreciate your participation in the Hillary Clinton guessing game. Please take the survey, which only takes 2 min.
Next, if you're new to this series it's actually the 12th post in the series.  I also have several satirical pieces on the blog.  Don't just dive in and say we are full of shit if you haven't watched at least the recap video and read the story.

Clinton has something handed to Holt (dude with papers is back right)
Clinton gives hand signals to Lester during debate for his intervention.

Clinton has wire and box tucked under pant suit
Clinton freezes during airplane conference.  Footage seems edited.

James Woods had previously exposed her use of an earpiece on Twitter, but that WAS NOT at the Presidential Debate.  Please notice the necklace.  Apparently she just likes red pant suits.
Here's the ear photo from the debate.
Here's a profile shot from a few years back-
Here's your side by side.
What's it mean?  Well the match looks very good to me.  Could it be surgically altered?  Yes.  Is there a non-zero chance, even if very small, she's a clone?  Yes.  So, it's a data point.  File it away, but you can for certain put it in the non-body double side for the debate.
After I asked you all for your thoughts on who showed up at the debate this is what came up so far.
For the clone theory diehards and those that want to check out the theory I'm posting thislink.
Here's a shot of a woman I believe is Double-2 (from Orlando event).  You'll note she's careful about showing her ears.  Here are more images from that day on Getty images.
Added a little bit to the Youtube Page and started a Twitter Account.
Here's the voice over.

About The Author

Dr. Reich is an open-minded science PhD that investigates controversial content to uncover what what appears valid and what appears bogus. He blogs at and can be found on youtube here:

Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.comThank you for reading.

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. " – Aristotle

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." - Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

Support Stillness in the Storm