Saturday, May 21, 2016

David Wilcock's: Wisdom Teachings - NASA's Quiet Disclosure Part 1

For other Wisdom Teachings summaries click here.

- Justin

Source - Discerning the Mystery

by Shem El-Jamal

In this episode of Wisdom Teachings, David Wilcock gets into further detail of 9/11 truth, and delves into two other subjects expected to be a part of the partial disclosure narrative. These are the lights seen on the surface of the planetoid, Ceres, as well as a mysterious plume discovered on the surface of Mars.

Along with these topics, Wilcock gets real on the subject of our ability to accept new ideas, and our need as evolving souls to achieve a certain level of mental flexibility in order to progress. For our discussion in this article, lets start with the fiction, and the truth of the 9/11 story.

What's Wrong with the Official 9/11 Theory?

As many of us may be aware, the official story behind the attacks on September 11 is riddled with holes so big you could drive a flat-bed truck through them. One prime example of such holes is the apparent radiation sickness of over 1,000 first responders to the scene of the twin towers after the attacks took place. This topic is even covered in mainstream news outlets. However, the topic is typically overlooked and dismissed as just another random detail which the mainstream theory explains. Lets take a look.

One particular CNN article details the fact that cancer is now covered under a program called the World Trade Center Health Program . This is a government-funded, medical compensation program established for the purpose of assisting first responders dealing with all of the health issues they contracted as a result of exposure to ground zero. We pick up where the article speaks of the mysterious link between cancer and the conditions at ground zero.
Potential cancer-causing agents such as asbestos that coated the World Trade Center buildings' lower columns, and benzene, a component of jet fuel that caused uncontrollable fires when planes barreled into the twin towers, have long been a cancer concern for researchers. Scientists were also worried about the high volume of particulates and gases inhaled by responders, survivors and people who lived in the area.

Yet some officials were worried about making the connection between 9/11 and cancer too soon. When the proposal to add cancer coverage was made, experts estimated the cost would total between $14.5 million and $33 million. And while someone's cancer may have been caused by his or her work at ground zero, it might also have been a coincidence -- they may have gotten cancer anyway.

A long lag time makes it particularly difficult to study the link. Cancer doesn't develop quickly after breathing in something toxic, the way asthma might. Instead, leukemia can take five to six years to develop, and solid tumors can take 10 to 20 years...

In the end, it was a study of firefighters that helped persuade the government to include cancer in the WTC Health Program. Researchers found firefighters who worked at ground zero were 19% more likely to develop cancer than firefighters who did not. According to the 2011 study, published in The Lancet medical journal, the increase occurred during the first seven years after 9/11. There were subtle increases seen in a few cancers in particular, including gastro-esophageal cancers and blood cancers such as multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

To put it simply, cancer takes anywhere from 5 to 10, and even 20 years to develop as a result to the chemical exposure that was claimed to be the cause of the various types of cancer the first responders suffered. In reality, there doesn't seem to be any explanation for this rapid rate of cancer growth which fits the official story. As David Wilcock mentions, such cancer does not show up immediately in its victims unless they are suffering from a different cause. This cause is radiation poisoning. For this explanation, we turn to Veterans Today.

Firefighters who recovered bodies at Ground Zero are developing cancer at a faster rate than those who worked before the atrocity, medical officials have revealed.
A seven-year study by the New York Fire Department has claimed that there are ‘unusual rises’ in the number of cancer cases among firefighters who worked in the aftermath of 9/11.

Some types of cancer among 9/11 firefighters are even ‘bizarrely off the charts’, according to sources who have seen the as-yet-undisclosed federal-funded study...

He said: ‘It’s a fact that New York City firefighters are dying of cancer in record numbers.

‘We have buried 10 firefighters in just the last 15 weeks, seven with cancer. On Sept. 10, 2001, they were young, healthy firefighters.’

In 2007, doctors at Mt. Sinai Medical Center, which monitors World Trade Center rescue workers, noted blood cancers like multiple myeloma, which normally strikes in the 60s or 70s, were being found in relatively young officers.

The New York state Health Department has confirmed that 345 Ground Zero workers have died of various cancers as of June 2010.

Related 9/11 was Stranger than we could have possibly imagined! Dr. Judy Wood at New Horizons - Where Did The Towers Go??

I will admit, there was once a time when I did not believe that any type of nuclear device would be used in modern times. However, with these types of findings, I can see it is very likely to be true. Though as stated in the last article (and the last episode), these are not the Little Boy orFat Man types of nuke. As Wilcock mentioned, these are 5th-generation nuclear weapons (code named “Blue Lightning”). They have a very short lifespan with regard to radioactivity, and do not cause the devastation many of us may expect from a nuclear device. They do however, cause significant destruction in small areas, and can easily vaporize any material adjacent to the blast (including people). This is said to be why there was so much dust created at ground zero, and why so much of this dust contained human remains.

Official Collapse Theory Defies All Laws of Physics

Video - Scene from the 2005 movie remake, War of the Worlds - Tom Cruise's Character,Ray, covered in the dust of human remains - Soft Disclosure?

So we have this radiation sickness, as well as this vaporized bone matter (along with other dustified materials) scatted all over downtown New York as two significant pieces of proof which may help to debunk the official story behind the 9/11 attacks. To this growing body of evidence, we add one of the most significant. This is the speed of the collapse of the three WTC towers. For this case, we turn to a video made by the organization, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.comThank you for reading.


Sign-up for RSS Updates:  Subscribe in a reader

[Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Blog by Email]
View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." - Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

Support Stillness in the Storm