Tuesday, April 5, 2016

David Wilcock's Wisdom Teachings: Pyramid Power - Fire in the Middle - Show Summary, In-Depth Analysis, and More

Shem provided a wealth of supportive information to bolster what David Wilcock presented in this episode. 

Related Russian Scientists Build And Study Pyramids | What They Found Could Change The World

Related Pyramid Power: Harnessing the Energetic Fields of Pyramids

For other Wisdom Teachings summaries click here.
- Justin

Source - Discerning The Mystery

By Shem El-Jamal

This episode of Wisdom Teachings seemed to cover more topics of discussion than one could fit into a half-hour time-frame (not to mention an article of reasonable length). As mentioned by David Wilcock, there are numerous subjects to discuss on pyramids, as these subjects basically incorporate most of the material in the Wisdom Teachings series. For the sake of balancing conciseness with depth of detail, I have chosen to concentrate on a few different subjects which Wilcock mentioned, and to digest how these different subjects tie into the technology of pyramids. 

As said before, numerous topics were mentioned during this discussion. Along with these, many great names in alternative science were referenced. These are each scientists who took a step back from convention in order to answer the question of how our universe really works, and whether or not the present, scientific mainstream has accurately explained it. Linda Moulton Howe was mentioned, and her research of pyramids found underground in Alaska. There was Dr.Patrick Flanagan, and his study of the influence of Earth-energy on the different shapes it interacts with, as well as Dr. Nikolai Kozyrev and his groundbreaking discoveries on torsion fields. Each one of these people found strong evidence that the Earth is emitting some type of harmonic energy (which goes beyond electromagnetic energy), that this energy is essential to life, and that it can be influenced by various shapes, such as pyramids. This collection of research shows the likelihood that these pyramids have a significant purpose behind them.

Related Links...

Linda Moulton Howe on the Alaskan Pyramid Underground Base - Youtube

Who is Dr.Patrick Flanagan?

Pyramid Power PDF Download


Kozyrev’s Mirrors – Bending Time& Altering Consciousness

(Wilcock makes mention of the studies of Dr. Patrick Flanagan and how Flanagan was actually able to sharpen razor blades using pyramids he had made. Apparently, these structures are some type of solid-state machines designed to harness an energy which produces a sort reverse-entropy effect (from my understanding). However, this energy is not visible to the naked eye.)
As this episode started out with a recap from the previous episode, I thought it a good idea to follow suite, for the sake of introduction and understanding. (Though if you haven't read the previous article, I strongly recommend that you do, so as not to feel lost in all of the details.) Started out, Wilcock mentions the origin of the word “pyramid”. We turn to Etymology.com for the following meaning.

before vowels pyr-, word-forming element form meaning "fire," from Greek pyro-, combining form of pyr (genitive pyros) "fire, funeral fire," also symbolic of terrible things, rages, "rarely as an image of warmth and comfort" [Liddell & Scott], from PIE root *paəwr- "fire" (see fire (n.)). Pyriphlegethon, literally "fire-blazing," was one of the rivers of Hell.
amid (prep.) 

late 14c., from amidde (c. 1200), from Old English on middan "in the middle," from dative singular of midde "mid, middle" (see middle); the phrase evidently was felt as "in (the) middle" and thus followed by a genitive case, and if this had endured we would follow it today with of. (See amidst for further evolution along this line).

According to the book, “Alien Agenda: The Return of the Nephilim” by Aaron Judkins and Michael McDaniel, the ancient Hermitians referred to the pyramids with another term.

“The ancient Khermitians used the term PR.NTR, Per-Neter, for pyramid. Per meaning “house” and Neter being translated by Egyptologists as “God” or “Goddess”, but we reject this mistranslation. In alignment with indigenous tradition, we use the interpretation “House of Nature, House of Energy” for Per-Neter. The temple was Per-Ba (House of the Soul) and the tomb was Per-Ka (House of the Physical Projection) according to indigenous traditions. With this understanding of Per-Neter as House of Nature, I state categorically that no one has ever intended to be buried in a pyramid in its original intent...”

(David Wilcock mentions numerous phenomenon which surround these technological monuments. He makes note of various situations in modern times in which animals would get into garbage cans located within these pyramids (most likely related to places where tours and held). According to accounts, those working there would commonly find that if ever animals were to die in these pyramids, they would only dry up. Their bodies would not rot or smell at all.  They would simply become mummified. It would seem from these account, that pyramids may harness an energy which prevents decay in some way.)

So we have these translations of House of Energy, and Fire in the Middle to chew on, and we're tasked with researching the science behind these meanings so as to find some amount of validity to them. (Of course in this task, it is important to remember that the scientific establishment has already precluded that there is nothing more to know, and that to further study the issue is ridiculous. The problem with this stance of the establishment is that it is unscientific. Preclusion is very common among the scientifically narrow-minded, yet this preclusion is a definitive enemy of reliable science. Needless to say, we aren't interested in preclusion, but in thorough investigation for the sake of reliable conclusion.) To start our investigation, lets look at the subjects of harmonics and geometry.

The Pioneers of the Science of Harmonics


“The Earth rings like a bell”--a commonly quoted statement from Nikola Tesla, but what does it mean? Could Tesla simply have been referring to the geotectonics of the Earth, or is there something more to this statement? I'm of the opinion that Tesla was referring to more than simply earthquakes and aftershocks.

The science of harmonics is one of both surprising complexity, and yet astounding simplicity. Lets take a look at a common wave form.


This is a standing wave (the image to the right). Of course, we call it this because it doesn't go anywhere, but instead, stays in place. These waves can be created in almost any fluid environment and when they are, they tend to form distinct, three-dimensional characteristics in geometry.

Related Links...


Hans Jenny's - Cymatic Soundscapes

It was Dr. Hans Jenny who coined the science of “Cymatics”. This was the study of the geometry that results when a fluid substance is exposed to perfect harmonic tones, such as those we find on a piano. Jenny proved that these standing waves can be found everywhere the conditions are right, and when given the space to create them, these wave occur three-dimensionally and follow spherical geometry. 

(This is another example of cymatic patterns (image to the right).)

This spherical geometry takes the form of what we refer to as the “platonic solids”.

(Before we get into the meat of this discussion, I felt it necessary to address one topic. It's no secret that numerous rumors of shape conspiracies are floating around which boast of supposed lies that NASA has told about the Earth's shape. However, as I've learned and observed over months of time, these conspiracies are founded upon clearly broken logic. This logic starts with the truth that NASA often tells half-truths and lies. However, this logic completely breaks down when the unproven assumption is made that NASA tells “all lies”. These shape-conspiracy narratives further assume that anyone who contradicts NASA is automatically telling the truth, and that there is no need to question the contradiction.

Upon close examination, one will likely find that these shape-conspiracy narratives are nothing more that a list of 20-plus textbook tactics of propaganda and manipulation, strung together into one ideology. They include Ad Hominem Attack, Appeal to the PeopleArguing from IgnoranceAssertionAstroturfBad Logic, Bad Science: Bait and SwitchBandwagon,Big LieCard StackingCelebritiesCompositionDemonizing the Opposition,DisinformationDivide and Conquer, Division... and the list goes on. These are all age-old tactics, many of which have been around for centuries. The reason we still see them being used by the establishment is because so many people keep falling for them.

The limited thought process behind these narratives are the exact same as those which caused each of us to be fooled by mainstream media for the majority of our lives. Consequently, I believe it is the responsibility of every mature adult to stop being the fool of someone else, to question and think critically on all information that we receive, and to learn how to determine fact from fiction before we start labeling this or that as “absolute truth”. Otherwise we have no one to blame but ourselves the next time we are mislead. For more information on this topic, click these two links... Flat Earth and AstroTurf: An In-Depth Examination of the Line Between Information and DisinformationThe Anatomy of Propaganda – Examining Multiple Tactics of Psychological Manipulation in Media Today.

With that said, lets get started.)

Platonic Geometry


For millennia, the concept of spherical geometry has been foundational within science, philosophy, and religion. In modern times, we have multiple religious symbols, mathematical theorems, and new age concepts which give credence to this sacred geometry, but what does it all mean, and what is the connection between these numerous areas of focus?

Many have heard of the geometric concept of the platonic solids. The tetrahedron, the hexahedron (or cube), the octahedron, the dodecahedron, and the icosahedron. These forms represent the most symmetrical objects in the universe. They are referred to as “spherical geometry” because every one of their corners is equidistant from their geometric center, and their relative forms each fit perfectly inside of a sphere of the exact same size.

Here is what Wikipedia has to say about platonic solids.

“In three-dimensional space, a Platonic solid is a regularconvex polyhedron. It is constructed by congruent regular polygonal faces with the same number of faces meeting at each vertex. Five solids meet those criteria, and each is named after its number of faces.

Geometers have studied the mathematical beauty and symmetry of the Platonic solids for thousands of years. They are named for the ancient Greek philosopher Plato who theorized in his dialogue, the Timaeus, that the classical elements were made of these regular solids.

The Platonic solids have been known since antiquity. Carved stone balls created by the late Neolithic people of Scotland lie near ornamented models resembling them, but the Platonic solids do not appear to have been preferred over less-symmetrical objects, and some of the Platonic solids may even be absent. Dice go back to the dawn of civilization with shapes that predated formal charting of Platonic solids.

The ancient Greeks studied the Platonic solids extensively. Some sources (such as Proclus) credit Pythagoras with their discovery. Other evidence suggests that he may have only been familiar with the tetrahedron, cube, and dodecahedron and that the discovery of the octahedron and icosahedron belong to Theaetetus, a contemporary of Plato. In any case, Theaetetus gave a mathematical description of all five and may have been responsible for the first known proof that no other convex regular polyhedra exist.

The Platonic solids are prominent in the philosophy of Plato, their namesake. Plato wrote about them in the dialogue Timaeus c.360 B.C. in which he associated each of the four classical elements (earthairwater, and fire) with a regular solid. Earth was associated with the cube, air with the octahedron, water with the icosahedron, and fire with the tetrahedron.”


These solids are named after the philosopher, Plato in modern times. However these forms were well known to many cultures which predated Plato by hundreds and even thousands of years. The Greeks, the Egyptians, and even ancient neolithic-age cultures seemed to have significant knowledge of platonic solid forms, but we aren't so much here for the name itself. There is one particular form which seems to be very significant in quantum physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and numerous other scientific disciplines.

Related Article...

What The Heck Did The Ancient Egyptians Play With This 20-Sided Die?

This shape we are focused on is created by interweaving the tetrahedron with its own inverse, or the inversion of its own form. We are talking about the “star tetrahedron”, or by its more commonly-known name, the “merkaba”. This star tetrahedron can be seen in numerous settings throughout multiple disciplines of science, yet it is most commonly ignore, or simply thought of as a fluke (or nice coincidence). However, research in alternative science has shown that it is this shape which is the foundation of universal structure.

The Merkaba Within the Sphere and 19.5 Degrees

The star tetrahedron appears in fractals and can be seen at every level of scale within the universe. In this explanation, we are particularly interested in the astral and planetary levels. Two note-worthy names in alternative science, Richard C. Hoagland and Lt. Col. Thomas Bearden, have both done solid research on this star tetrahedron and its various pronunciations throughout our solar system.

Related Links...

Zero Energy - Thomas Bearden

New Energy Series Vol. 1 Tom Bearden (Free energy)

Pulling Energy from the Vacuum - Lt.Col. Thomas Bearden

From his website, Richard C. Hoagland presents a table detailing the numerous bodies within our solar system that show evidence of this underlying, tetrahedral geometry.

Related Oldest Pyramid Ever Found in Crimea

CONTINUE READING @ discerningthemystery2000plus.blogspot.com



Sign-up for RSS Updates:  Subscribe in a reader

[Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Blog by Email]
View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." - Buddha

If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

[Click on Image below to Contribute]

Support Stillness in the Storm